• This post is a little different from my previous ones, more “from the heart,” less formal. What I want to express here is simple… while there are things we can know about the pre-Christian Anglo-Saxons, there is also much we will never know for certain. I write about what I learn through reading, researching, and reflecting. As I said in my welcome post, I’m not an expert and don’t claim to be one. I’m simply sharing the path I’m walking and what I learn along the way.

    One of the strongest impressions I get when reading about life in early England after the arrival of Christianity is that it seems to have been a pretty miserable time for many people. I was raised in an extremely rigid form of Christianity myself so I can relate. Our congregation never had more than a dozen people. The rules were suffocating, the punishments harsh, and God was presented as a being of pure wrath. I cannot remember hearing the words “God’s love” even once. Everything was centered on hell and eternal torment. And the “goal posts” were always moving. Just when I thought I was getting close to approval, suddenly it wasn’t enough.

    Those teachings never made sense to me. They still don’t. And looking back, it’s no wonder, they were completely at odds with how I saw the world. Even as a child, I saw life and spirit everywhere, in rivers, trees, animals, and the very Earth beneath my feet. I didn’t have a word for it then, but now I know that what I felt was animism.

    In that small church community, animals weren’t considered conscious at all. They weren’t seen as beings with their own lives, their own experiences, their own worth. They were background scenery, created solely for human use and enjoyment. I remember being told that animals didn’t even feel pain, that it was perfectly fine to hunt for sport because “they don’t suffer.” To them, animals were little more than moving biological machines. It horrified me then, even before I had language for why. I can understand hunting our of necessity for food, but not for sport.

    I’m grateful to be far removed from that culture now, both in distance and in time. I’m finally free to be myself. Back where I grew up, it still isn’t wise to openly express animist beliefs (or any belief that isn’t Christian and far-right politically). Leaving allowed me to breathe, to think, and to grow into the person I was always meant to be.

    All of this is why I write here. I enjoy it. I learn from it. And I want to share what I’m discovering as I go. There is nothing in the surviving writings that plainly states the early English peoples were “animist”, the word itself wasn’t even coined until 1870 by Edward Burnett Tylor. But there are clues. There are patterns. Much like their Nordic neighbors, the early Anglo-Saxons didn’t only worship gods of natural forces, they saw those forces as the gods. Thunor wasn’t simply the god over thunder. He was the thunder. He was the living power of the storm.

    Since I already hold an animist worldview myself, perhaps it’s easier for me to recognize animist hints in ancient beliefs. I do my best, though, to stay close to the evidence. And from what I’ve found so far, it seems clear that the early Anglo-Saxons held at least some animistic ways of seeing the world. We see hints of this worldview in charms like the Nine Herbs Charm, where plants are addressed as beings with agency.

    So I keep studying, and I keep writing. I hope what I share here brings you something, whether it’s insight, inspiration, or simply a sense of connection.

    ~Buck

  • Before Christianity reshaped the landscape of belief in England, the early English lived in a world that was fully alive. Not metaphorically or symbolically, just alive in the most literal way they understood. (This is all from what can be known of course. I should make clear that as far as can be known, all writings about pre-Christian Anglo-Saxons (and other “pagans”) came later, from non-pagans.)

    Wind, trees, streams, stones, fire, ancestors, animals, and unseen presences all moved within a shared web of being. There was no strict boundary between “spirit” and “matter,” because the world did not divide itself that way. Life was a continuum, not a hierarchy. Everything participated in the great unfolding of wyrd.

    This wasn’t a “religion” in the modern sense as we think of religions today. It had no single doctrine, no universal creed, or enforced system. It was an outlook, or worldview, a way of walking through the world, paying attention to the living presence of things.

    A World of Presences

    In Old English, the word gast (spirit) didn’t mean a ghostly figure so much as a vital presence, a being with its own kind of life. A hill could have its own gast. So could a grove, a stream, or a household. Even the word land could imply something that responds, not just something that sits silently underfoot.

    To the early English, the world was not an object but a community, a tapestry woven of visible and invisible companions. Humans belonged to that same tapestry, but they didn’t own it or stand above it. They were simply one thread among many.

    Everyday Animism

    If you’re looking for grand rituals or dramatic ceremonies, you won’t find many in the surviving sources. Early English animism appears in the small things, the everyday gestures of relationship. A word spoken to the fire when lighting it. Or a nod to a boundary stone or a spring. A charm whispered into the wind. A moment of stillness before crossing into a forested place.

    These weren’t superstitions meant to control the world. They were acknowledgments like, “I see you, I live alongside you.” This kind of animism is quiet and woven into ordinary life. It doesn’t demand belief in anything extravagant. It only asks that we meet the world as a partner instead of a backdrop.

    The Hearth and the Land

    Two places held special meaning in this animistic worldview, the hearth, where the household’s inner life glowed, and the land, where all life moved in slow, steady rhythms. To tend the hearth was to honor the bond within the home. To tend the land was to honor the bond with it.

    This didn’t mean worshiping nature in some grand or ceremonial way. It meant living with a sense of kinship, greeting the wind as you stepped outside, leaving a little food for wandering animals, thanking the stream you washed in, or noticing how the light changed with the turning seasons. Animism was not something separate from daily life. It was daily life.

    A Modern Way to Listen

    We can’t live exactly as they did, and we shouldn’t try. But we can live with similar attentiveness. We can listen to the wind as if it carries memory. We can touch the bark of a tree with the same quiet respect our ancestors once gave their groves. We can speak to the hearth (or its modern equivalent) as the place where warmth and life gather.

    Most of all, we can remember that we are not alone in the world, not because of fantasy or nostalgia, but because life truly is interconnected in ways the early English understood back then.

    Animism isn’t about looking back. It’s about paying attention to the now, and recognizing the living world that still surrounds us.

    I should note again the limitations of what, exactly, can be known since writings about ancient cultures were done by later Christian scribes. Sometimes the Romans also. Much can be inferred with a fairly high degree of confidence though. But it’s best to take care not to assume too much in areas where there a no known records, written or archaeologically.

    ~Buck 

  • In the world of the early English, the hearth was more than a place to cook or keep warm, it was the living heart of the home. It was where families gathered, stories were told, and prayers or charms were whispered to the unseen powers. The hearth gave light in the long dark months and smoke that curled upward like thin threads between the human world and the unseen world.

    Before books or churches shaped their sense of meaning, the people of those older days found their sacred center close by, glowing in the coals. To keep a fire alive was to tend to life itself.
     When the fire burned low, it was gently stirred, not just for convenience, but because it was part of the family’s breath, part of the household’s wyrd.

    A Living Center

    The word hearth shares roots with heart, and the connection isn’t a poetic accident. Both words speak to what keeps life moving, warmth, pulse, and rhythm. The hearth’s fire was both physical and spiritual, a source of heat, food, protection, and continuity. When a family moved, they might carry a coal from their old hearth to light the new one, symbolically carrying their lineage and luck with them.

    To neglect the hearth was to risk more than cold; it was to let the household’s center falter.
     Tending it was an act of devotion… a small ritual repeated countless times each day, through which ordinary people wove their lives into the greater pattern of being.

    The Hearth as Threshold

    The hearth was also a threshold between worlds. The smoke rose toward the gods and ancestors, the light held back the shadows. Some old charms speak to fire as if it listens, as if it remembers.
     In that flickering warmth, people felt themselves part of something vast and alive, the turning of seasons, the cycle of growth and decay, the shared rhythm of existence.

    In an animist sense, the hearth was not just a thing that burned, it was a being that connected. A silent companion. A witness and a bridge.

    The Hearth Wyrd Within

    Even now, so long after stone hearths gave way to metal stoves and electric heat, the image endures. When we talk about “keeping the home fires burning,” something old stirs beneath the phrase. We are remembering that to be human is to tend to, care for, and keep the small flame of meaning alive against the dark.

    Maybe that’s why hearth wyrd felt like the right name for this blog. Because each word we write, every small act of kindness or attention, is another ember, another way of saying, “The fire still burns, and we are still here, listening for the whispers beneath the everyday”.

  • The word wyrd often gets translated as “fate,” but that translation misses something essential. In the older, pre-Christian English worldview, wyrd wasn’t a fixed destiny written somewhere beyond us. It wasn’t something separate from life, as if imposed on us from above.

    Wyrd is the ongoing weaving of all things. The way events, relationships, choices, memory, and the living world shape one another continuously. Wyrd is happening in every moment, everywhere. It’s not a script. It’s a pattern that’s in motion.

    What Wyrd Is Not

    Wyrd is not a predetermined fate, a cosmic plan set by gods, something unchangeable, a moral judgment, or an individual destiny in the sense we think of “destiny” today.

    Those ideas come later, from other traditions and other centuries.

    In the older understanding, wyrd is relational. It emerges from how beings exist together. If everything is interwoven, then 1.Everything we do matters. 2.Everything we fail to do matters. This isn’t a burden. It’s participation.

    Wyrd as an Unfolding

    The Old English verb connected to wyrd is weorðan, meaning “to become”, “to turn into being”, or “to unfold.” Wyrd is the ongoing becoming of the world. Like a field becoming spring or a river reshaping its banks. It’s a moment of kindness shaping a life years later. Everything influences everything else. This is wyrd.

    The early English didn’t separate the sacred from the ordinary, the spiritual from the material, or the human from the land. Life itself was woven.

    The hearth fire, the grain field, the weather, the well, the ancestors remembered in story… all of these were part of the same fabric of being. Wyrd was not a concept reserved for priests or poets. It was simply the truth of how existence unfolds.

    Choice Within Wyrd

    If wyrd is always weaving, then we are always participating. We are threads in the pattern, but also “shapers” of it. Our actions ripple. Our quietness ripples. Our fear ripples and our love ripples.

    Wyrd is shaped by how we tend the land and how we speak to others. Also by how we remember those who came before us (our ancestors). It’s shaped by how we respond to difficulty and how we hold ourselves in the presence of others. The weave is continuous and we are part of it.

    Why Wyrd Matters Now

    To understand wyrd is to know that we are not alone in the world, and never have been. We are shaped by climate, ancestors, community, memory and suffering and also by joy. Everything that has touched our lives. And in turn, we shape what comes after us.

    It’s like an invitation to participate with great care. To listen more closely. To speak more thoughtfully. To act with awareness. To know that nothing we do is meaningless. Even the smallest gesture is part of the weaving.

    A Simple Practice

    Today, please take a moment and pause. Notice where you are, what you are touching, and what is touching you.

    Let yourself feel the thread you are in, the thread of your life, your history, your land, your breath, your presence here. No need to try to force meaning. Just notice that you are woven into everything around you. That noticing alone is enough. No need to try to force any sort of belief. Just taking moments like this is enough, especially in today’s busy world.

    ~Buck

  • Welcome to Hearth Wyrd!

    This space is a record of my study and exploration of pre-Christian Anglo-Saxon life, language, and worldview. I’m not a scholar, a historian, or a reconstructionist. I’m simply a learner, someone who is reading, listening, reflecting, and letting the old words and old ways settle into my understanding of the world.

    Everything written here is shared in that spirit… curiosity, reverence, and humility.
     

    I have no interest in trying to revive a lost religion, or in claiming any kind of “cultural authority”. The world of the early English and their continental Germanic kin is far too old, too changed, and too woven into centuries of continuity, loss, and transformation for any modern person to re-create it exactly as it once was.

    Instead, I am interested in something quieter… How they lived. How they saw the land. How they understood kinship with all things, home, memory, and the unseen. How their language shaped thought and how thought shaped spirit.

    In other words, I’m drawn to the everyday, not the heroic.
     To the hearth, not the hall.
     To the field, not the battlefield.

    And especially to wyrd, the unfolding, interwoven nature of all things.

    This blog is where I’ll keep notes on what I’m learning… small translations from Old English, reflections on the animist and ancestral worldview of the time, pieces of material culture and daily life, thoughts on land and memory, and the quiet ways the old may still speak through the world around us.

    This is not a space for:

    • nationalism
    • racial or cultural identity claims
    • reenactment culture
    • or “Viking” aesthetic fantasy

    If anything, this is a space moving in the opposite direction, toward gentleness, humility, curiosity, and continuity with the ordinary.

    I’ll be learning as I go. I’ll be wrong sometimes, and I’ll revise as needed.
     
     Thank you for being here!
     

    May something meaningful rise from the hearth embers and the quiet earth.

    ~Buck